Reynolds
bails on tonight's debate; Sullivan doesn't
Also
on this page:
Reynolds
dances
on discredited Sullivan allegations.
Reynolds
camp finds, takes the low
road. |
Aug.
23, 2006 - State Sen. Tom Reynolds backed out of
a debate scheduled for Wednesday, but Democratic challenger
Jim Sullivan will participate in the event, Sullivan's campaign
manager said.
Reynolds
bailed because organizers would not ban non-media video
cameras.
"Is
Reynolds trying to hide from his extremism and his public
record?" Sullivan campaign manager Lewis Rosser asked
during an interview.
Reynolds,
a West Allis Republican, backed out of the long-scheduled
forum on Tuesday, after learning that non-media news cameras
might be allowed, according to wispolitics.com.
"I
was trying to kind of clean up these debates and not have
these groups filming their attack ads there," he said.
Organizers
refused to give in to Reynolds' demand for a last-minute
change in the debate rules.
"They're
public officials -- video cameras would be appropriate,"
Rosser said.
Sullivan,
a Wauwatosa alderman, lawyer, and Navy Reserves officer,
welcomes video cameras, Rosser said.
Reynolds
this week said he directed that discredited allegations
about Sullivan be sent to JJ Blonien, a Reynolds campaign
consultant and Senate staffer (see story below). Backing
out of the debate means that Reynolds won't have to answer
questions about the incident.
Sullivan
and Reynolds are vying for the 5th District Senate seat.
That district includes Story Hill.
The
forum will be at 7 p.m. tonight at the Unitarian Universalist
Church West, 13001 W. North Ave, Brookfield.
Reynolds
previously ran afoul of rules allowing video camera use
at the Wauwatosa
Public Library.
Printer-friendly
version
Reynolds
dances on discredited Sullivan allegations
Aug.
21, 2006 -- State Sen. Tom Reynolds (R-West Allis)
refused Monday to repudiate allegations that his Democratic
challenger, Jim Sullivan, voted twice in 1996 even though
the district attorney's office rejected the same claims
six years ago.
Reynolds
acknowledged that he personally directed Michael Goggins,
who first made the allegations,
to send relevant voting records to JJ Blonien, a Reynolds
campaign consultant, who helped ensure their further spread.
"What
Mike Goggins has is interesting information," Reynolds
said in an interview.
Blonien
has acknowledged sending the records to Stan Zurawski, a
well-known Wauwatosa anti-porn and anti-stormwater retention
pond protester who has run unsuccessully for mayor multiple
times.
Progressive
blogger Bill
Christofferson has uncovered evidence that Blonien
actually wrote the letter Zurawski sent to the Wauwatosa
News-Times this month that dredged up the old charges
Sullivan's
campaign manager Lewis Rosser said in an interview that
it is clear that the Reynolds' campaign was behind the attack.
Sullivan still has not ruled out taking legal action against
those involved in spreading the discredited allegations.
Printer-friendly
version
Reynolds'
camp finds, takes the low road
Discredited allegations, foul language
featured
Aug.
18, 2006 -- The campaign for the
5th District state senate seat hit a low point this week
when Republicans associated with incumbent Tom Reynolds
(R-West Allis) spread discredited allegations that Democratic
challenger Jim Sullivan voted twice in 1996 presidential
election.
The district
includes Story Hill.
"F*** you,"
conservative Republican publisher Bob Donhal responded when
progressive blogger Bill Christofferson cautioned that continuing
to push the allegations could bring "legal peril."
"Oh Boy,
you frighten me so much I am peeing in my pants," Donhal
wrote in an e-mail to Christofferson.
Donhal, publisher
of the Conservative Digest, is closely allied with Reynolds.
Reynolds could not be reached for comment Friday.
Donhal said later
his cursing was simply repeating what Sullivan's attorney
said to him six years ago.
"Crude people
Sullivan and his attorney," Donhal wrote.
The double-voting
allegation, originally made in 2000 by Wauwatosa resident
Michael Goggins, was dismissed at that time by the district
attorney's office.
Goggins alleged
that Sullivan voted in Wauwatosa and Whitefish Bay. Sullivan
lives in Wauwatosa; his father, James O. Sullivan Sr., lives
in Whitefish Bay.
The district
attorney's office said in dismissing Goggins allegation:
The Whitefish
Bay voter history list fails to carefully distinguish
James Sullivan, Sr. from James Sullivan, Jr. More specifically,
the entry for "Sullivan, James (Jr.)" lists
a date of birth of "10/27/36." James Sullivan,
Jr., in fact, is just 32 years old. He was not born in
1936. This confusion as to voter identity renders Whitefish
Bay voter history records as to James Sullivan, Jr. and
James Sullivan Sr. unreliable and valueless.
Sullivan's lawyer,
Michael Hart, also cautioned Donhal in 2000 that the double-voting
allegation was false.
The purpose
of this letter is to place you on formal notice that any
further communication whether written or oral including
but not limited to, the dissemination and/or distribution
of campaign literature claiming that Mr. Sullivan engaged
in illegal or improper conduct with respect to his voting
history, place of residency and/or compliance with State
election laws will be deemed actionable as knowing misstatements
of fact, and we will take any and all legal action on
behalf of Mr. Sullivan to enforce his rights.
|