Also
on this page:
WisDOT
lets invasives
flourish.
SEWRPC
takes issue with Barrett. |
No
help with invasives from WisDOT in 2005-07
Aug.
15, 2005 -- The Wisconsin Department of Transportation
will not resume invasive species control under its new
2005-07 budget, according to the agency.
WisDOT,
citing budget woes, dropped efforts to control the harmful
and aggressive plants last year.
Local
governments and private property owners are left to deal
with them as they migrate from WisDOT property.
"The
new budget does not restore any service reductions,"
agency spokeswoman Peg Schmitt wrote in an e-mail. "The
budget did provide funds intended to cover inflation and
system growth to allow continuation of the existing, reduced
service levels."
WisDOT
lets invasives flourish
Directive prohibits control
efforts: parks, neighborhoods pay the price
Aug.
8, 2005 -- The State Department of Transportation
last
year dropped efforts to control invasive plants, and allowed
the harmful species to spread to neighbrohoods, parks,
and lawns, records show.
The
directive to let invasives bloom was renewed
on June 1 of this year, just as Wisconsin kicked
off its first ever Invasive Species Awareness
Month, according to documents obtained through
an Open Records request.

Field bindweed overtakes DOT right-of-way
at I-94 near the Story Hill neighborhood.
"Do
not issue any contracts for noxious weed control
for this calendar year," a WisDOT official
wrote to other agency employees in July 2004.
"If a contract has already been issued,
fulfill the contract obligations but keep the
work to a minimum. Noxious weed control by county
forces should not be done."
Invasives
pose a significant threat to the state's economy
and environment, experts say. Millions of dollars
are spent annually in Wisconsin to control them,
according to the Wisconsin Council on Invasive
Species.
WisDOT's surrender to invasives undermined those
expensive and labor-intensive efforts by public
and private agencies.
The
order to drop invasive control efforts came
from John Kinar, WisDOT chief of winter operations
and roadside management.
Gov.
Jim Doyle, who has publicly endorsed efforts
to battle invasives, issued a proclamation recognizing
the awareness
month.
DOT
officials said budget constraints forced the
decision to let invasives bloom. Last month,
however, when the agency appealed to the Joint
Finance Committee for an additional $15 million
in highway maintenance funding, it did not ask
for more money to fight invasives. The Legislative
Fiscal Bureau simply noted that WisDOT had eliminated
funding for spraying noxious weeds.
It
could not be immediately determined whether
the WisDOT will resume invasive control under
the 2005-07 state budget.

Field bindweed and black bindweed on
DOT right-of-way just outside of Oak Creek's
Falk Park.
The
"let 'em grow" edict allowed invasives control
efforts only when it improved motorist safety. It applied
even to the three plants that WisDOT is required to fight
by law, Kinar said in his memo to employees. Those plants
are field bindweed, Canada thistle and leafy spurge.
"Doing
what we agree is the right thing is not an option."
----John
Kinar, WisDOT official
"There
are several other species that are particularly invasive
in the state that, while we are not legally required to
do so, we should be making an effort to control on the
basis of environmental stewardship," he wrote. "Unfortunately,
current budget constraints do not allow us to even fulfill
the legal requirements to control the state listed noxious
weeds."
"Requests
for weed control from the public or from county weed commissioners
should be handled by explaining that budget constraints
require that we must give safety-related activites higher
priority," Kinar said.
When
an employee from WisDOT's District 2, which includes Milwaukee
County, expressed concern about the widespread invasives
problem here, Kinar put him in his place.
"Doing
what we agree is the right thing is not an option,"
Kinar wrote.
He
added: "Even if all of the safety concerns (low shoulders,
potholes, worn pavement markings, damaged signs) have
been addressed in the counties in district 2, that's certainly
not the case in other districts. If the wide array of
safety related activities have been addressed in district
2, we'll need to reevaluate the distribution of funds
to help assure that our priority needs are being addressed
statewide".
Invasive
species of all types cost the national economy up to about
$137 billion per year, mainly due to losses in agriculture,
forestry and fisheries, according to the Wisconsin Council
on Invasive Species.
"About
42% of the species on the Federal Threatened or Endangered
species lists are at risk primarily because of invasive
species," the Council said.
SEWRPC
takes issue with Barrett
But doesn't address Milwaukee mayor's main
points
July
11, 2005 -- Mayor Barrett was off-base
in his criticism of the Southeastern Wisconsin
Regional Planning Commission, a SEWRPC official
said in a letter to two state senators.
SEWRPC's
letter
defended the planning agency and said its environmental
justice and community outreach efforts satisfied
Bush Administration officials.
The
letter, by SEWRPC Executive Director Philip
Evenson, parried criticisms Barrett leveled
at the agency as he opposed funding for Zoo
Interchange reconstruction funding in the 2005-07
biennium.
Many
of Barrett's statements "are without foundation
or deserving of additional information,"
Evenson wrote.
Barrett
was highly critical of SEWRPC's regional freeway
study that called for the expansion of 127 miles
of Milwaukee-area freeways, including the Zoo
Interchange. Most of the negative impacts, including
the destruction of homes and businesses, would
be in Milwaukee and Milwaukee County.
SEWRPC "chose to further divide the metro
area on transportation issues," Barrett
wrote. "The result is a climate in which
any freeway project in Milwaukee County will
be unnecessarily contentious, resulting in wasted
dollars and delays."
Evenson
did not address that criticism.
Barrett
said there was no need to fund the Zoo Interchange
reconstruction studies in 2005-07, a point Evenson
also did not address.
Evenson,
in his letter to Senate Marjority Leader Dale
Schultz (R-Richland Center) and Minority Leader
Judith Robsin (D-Beloit) said the freeway planning
process was endorsed by supervisors who represent
most of the region's population.
SEWRPC's
creative combining of distinct governmental
units -- its argument is akin to saying the
California Legislature represents most of the
populations of California and Wisconsin -- already
has drawn the wrath of Milwaukee County Supervisory
Lynne DeBruin. During testimony before an FHWA
panel, she called it "fraudulent, misled
the public and state decision-makers and undermined
SEWRPC's relationship with Milwaukee County."
In
addition, supervisors voted on the plan without
having to consider how to pay for it, as the
$7 billion SEWRPC proposal did not include a
funding mechanism. William Drew, chairman of
the SEWRPC freeway study advisory committee,
maintained that cost was irrelevant to the planning
process.
Evenson
also disputed Barrett's contention that the city of Milwaukee
is on record against the plan. The city is on record in
opposition only to the part of the plan that would widen
19 miles of city freeway, while it supported constructing
the freeway to modern design standards, Evenson said.