Storyhill Logo

Check Out Other News & Issues Pages

Also on this page:

Canal St. extension moves forward.

Old agreement resolves Canal St. issue.

Canal St. extension hits snag.

Council to consider Canal St. access to Miller Park roads

Dec. 12, 2005 -- A plan to allow Canal St. traffic to use a Miller Park road to get to the freeway and other west side streets city streets will be considered Monday by a Common Council committee.

The plan to route traffic from the extended Canal St. through the stadium could also affect traffic in Story Hill, which is northwest of the stadium.

Under the proposal to be considered by the Public Works Committee, traffic could enter or leave Canal St. via the stadium's South Access Road. Click here to see a map.

During normal traffic times, the traffic would flow on two eastbound lanes and two westbound lanes, according to city documents.

In hours preceding a Brewers game or other stadium event, the traffic flow would be on three lanes eastbound and one lane westbound.

That will be reversed in the hours after an event ends -- the traffic will be on one lane eastbound and three lanes westbound, according to the documents.

The plan calls for the installation of more visual blight -- including six overhead sign structures, a variable message sign, static signage, and pavement markings, according to city documents.

Construction and engineering costs of the project, which also includes new pavement, curbs, gutters, and sidewalks, are estimated at $350,000.

The Wisconsin Department of Transportation has agreed to provide
$40,000 in Marquette Interchange mitigation funds for the signage.


Canal Street extension moves forward

March 28, 2005 -- The Common Council has given the go-ahead for construction of the Canal Street extension from 25th St. to Miller Park.

The project, including an extension to the Hank Aaron Trail, is expected to cost about $15.6 million, according to city documents. The state is expected to pay $8.2 million of the project's cost, while the city will kick in $9.4 million, according to the documents.

The project needs to be completed by April 1, 2006 to allow it to qualify for $5 million in federal funding as an alternative traffic route during reconstruction of the Marquette Interchange. If it's not done by then, the state can withhold $5 million in future funds that otherwise might be due the city.


Old agreement resolves Canal St. issue
Street extension can proceed

Feb. 28, 2005 -- A seven-year-old agreement between the Milwaukee Brewers Baseball Club and the former owner of neighboring property will allow the Canal St. hookup to Miller Park to proceed, according to Stadium District Executive Director Mike Duckett.

"It looks like Canal St.'s going to happen and it's on schedule," Duckett said last week. Bids will be let in March, he said.

The city does not need to make any concessions to the Brewers, the Stadium District, or the Story Hill neighborhood in order to proceed with the project.

The Canal St. project hit snags earlier this month when the Brewers demanded the city place parking restrictions on private property in the Menomonee Valley east of Miller Park and made other demands that Ald. Robert Bauman termed "outrageous." It looked for a time like the street extension may not happen.

Then, however, the city turned up a 1998 agreement between the Brewers and CMC Heartland Partners, former owners of Menomonee Valley land now owned by the city. Under the agreement, which the Stadium District also signed on to as the property's landlord, CMC had access to Miller Park property and use of the south ring road. The city bought the CMC property in 2003.

The city believes that "the agreement goes with the land" and that the access rights now belong to the city, Duckett said.

Stadium District lawyers examined the document and agreed, he said.

The team still will have the right to install traffic controls, Duckett said.

The agreement calls for the city to pay 75% of the cost of maintaining the road, and the Brewers to pay the other 25%.


Canal St. extension hits a roadblock

Feb. 11, 2005 -- Canal St. extension plans were delayed at a crucial stage this week when a Common Council committee refused to act on an important agreement that would link Canal St. to Miller Park.

The committee chairman, Ald. Robert Bauman, publicly ridiculed some of the terms sought by the Milwaukee Brewers, the team's parking contractor, and the Stadium District in the proposed pact.

"I'm astounded they would have the chutzpah to make these demands," Bauman said.

The agreement would, among other things, require the city to protect Imperial Parking's Miller Park franchise by prohibiting parking on public and private property along and near Canal St. west of 25th St. The city would be liable for any revenue losses suffered by the Brewers due to violations of the restrictions.

"They want to control the parking on Canal St., which the citizens of Milwaukee are paying for, for three-quarters of a mile east of their stadium so people can't park on the street and walk to a baseball game," Bauman said. "I find that outrageous.

The decision to hold the item in committee left officials scrambling to resolve outstanding issues so bids on the project can be bid out early next month. Construction timing is crucial so the project can qualify for Marquette Interchange mitigation funding.

Officials said they would try to complete the documents so they can be considered at a special Public Improvements Committee meeting before the Feb. 22 Common Council meeting.

The draft agreement before the committee this week outlined the terms under which Miller Park's North and South Ring Roads would be turned over to the city to allow traffic to enter and leave the stadium from Canal St., which is to be extended westward from 25th St.

The extended road is supposed to be an alternate route for Marquette Interchange traffic when major reconstruction work is being done on the downtown freeway intersection.

The city did not aggressively pursue negotiations with the many parties involved in Miller Park. The result: a last minute rush on a project the city has known about for years.

As Michael Horne reported on www.milwaukeeworld.com, the agreement was added to the committee agenda just one day before it was to be considered. Aldermen were supposed to vote on it even though it was in draft form and still had negotiators' notes and comments on its pages.

Ald. Michael Murphy, who represents the Miller Park and Story Hill area, said he had no objection to delaying action on the proposed agreement. Some of the terms in the draft were new to him and different than what was presented to area residents at two neighborhood meetings, he said. Murphy said he wanted to make sure of their meaning and impacts.

"I have some reservations on some of the issues," he said. He said he had concerns about the project's impact on the Story Hill neighborhood.

"I just want to be more comfortable with some of the things I've heard this morning...the devil's in the details," he said.


Bauman


Listen to his comments


Murphy


Listen to his comments

The draft agreement would require the city to:

  • Adopt legislation and install "No Parking 1 Hour Before until 1 Hour after Stadium Events" signs west of 25th St. and on nearby local roads.
  • Include restrictive covenants on sales of city land in the Menomonee Valley prohibiting parking for Miller Park events on the property, whether or not the parking is free.
  • Indemnify the state, the Brewers and the Baseball District for any repair or maintenance costs of the stadium ring roads.

Traffic on the Canal St. extension in and out of the stadium would be maintained as two-way traffic except when stadium events are expected to draw more than 15,000, or whenever the Brewers or the Stadium District felt that limiting traffic to one-way would be desirable.

Two-way traffic in the case of crowds in excess of 15,000 would be prohibited for four hours before the event and for one-and-a-half hours after the event.

"Now if you take a day game, that means they control the traffic from 9 in the morning to five thirty in the afternoon," Bauman said. "And this is supposed to be a Marquette mitigation measure. You can't mitigate the Marquette Interchange when they're out there saying you can only have one-way traffic all day long because we have a home game that might have 16,000 people attending it."

Full disclosure: storyhill.net editor Gretchen Schuldt is a former member of the Stadium District Board.

 

storyhill.net is independently owned and operated.