4th
Congressional District candidates
On
the issues:
Freeway expansion
(Second
of a series)
July
26 -- The Southeastern Wisconsin
Regional Planning Commission has recommended adding
lanes to 127 miles of freeway in the region. The
estimated cost, in 2000 dollars, is $6.2 billion.
Federal revenue would fund a significant portion
of the freeway expansion. Would you favor using
federal money for this purpose? Why or why not?
Republicans
Gerald
H. Boyle: Highways were
a federal initiative after WW II. Interstates remain
the number one mode of transportation for all goods
and services in the United States. If needed, federal
money should be used to fund highway improvement
and expansion.
Corey
Hoze: did
not respond.
Democrats
Tim
Carpenter:
SEWRPC’s plans to favor expansion of capacity
over supporting the repair and maintenance of existing
roadways are unwise, and need to be redone. The
plans will encourage unreasonable sprawl and seem
to be based upon the disproved notion that adding
lanes will reduce congestion. Further, SEWRPC’s
plans, especially with relation to the enlargement
of the Marquette Interchange, have disregarded the
harm they will cause to the local community.
Matt
Flynn:
My
primary objective is to use federal dollars to improve
and modernize mass transit systems, and to maintain
a safe highway system. I think that freeway expansion
for the sake of expansion simply leads to more traffic,
urban sprawl, and bad land use practices. I want
to create good jobs with good benefits in Milwaukee
County, with a transportation infrastructure that
supports economic expansion and an accessible workforce.
Freeway expansion for the sake of expansion is counter
to that objective, and I would not favor appropriating
funds for that reason.
Gwen
Moore:
I
am concerned with the impact of this proposal on
our communities. Many studies have shown that freeway
expansion is unlikely to significantly reduce congestion
and leads to an increase in urban sprawl and air
pollution, endangering both the environment and
public health. We must look for long-term solutions
to our transportation problems rather than a quick
fix through building up our freeways. In Congress,
I will work to direct federal money to our area
to fund mass transit and environmentally-friendly
transportation initiatives.
Independents
Tim
Johnson: Improving
our transportation infrastructure is an important
part of helping the region’s economic stability
in the future. While I support both freeway expansion
and mass transit initiatives such as the Downtown
Connector, I do believe a greater percentage of
federal dollars needs to be dedicated to mass transit.
We have a looming energy crisis and it is important
that the federal government seeks the greater good
by dedicating more funding to mass transit and alternative
fuel research. The freeways of tomorrow will be
used by automobiles that burn alternative fuels,
which is far more palatable than the status quo.
In short, I would be open to anything we can do
to improve the region’s infrastructure for
the good of everyone.
Robert
H. Raymond could not be reached.
***
Constitution
Party
Colin
Hudson could not be reached.
Read
about the candidates' positions on
Water
Diversion
The
Iraq War
Budget
Priorities
The
Patriot Act
The
Bush Tax Cuts
What
we're doing: storyhill.net and the
Riverwest Currents newspaper asked 4th Congressional
District candidates to respond to questions about
issues relevant to Milwaukee-area voters.
Eight
candidates are competing to replace Democratic U.S.
Rep. Gerald D. Kleczka, who is not seeking re-election.
The 4th District includes all of Milwaukee, Cudahy,
St. Francis, South Milwaukee, West Milwaukee and
part of West Allis.
The
questions and candidates' answers will be carried
on the storyhill.net web site and in the Riverwest
Currents newspaper.There will be Republican and
Democratic primaries Sept. 14. The general election
is Nov. 2.